Taylor v. Vion

New York Court of Appeals

Taylor v. Vion

147 N.E.2d 733, 3 N.Y.2d 1008, 170 N.Y.S.2d 342, 1957 N.Y. LEXIS 698

DecidedDecember 6, 1957

StatusPublished

This text of 147 N.E.2d 733 (Taylor v. Vion) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Taylor v. Vion, 147 N.E.2d 733, 3 N.Y.2d 1008, 170 N.Y.S.2d 342, 1957 N.Y. LEXIS 698 (N.Y. 1957).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Relator seeks to vacate certain assessments in their entirety on the ground that they were increased after grievance day without notice to him, and without his having appeared or been examined. On this ground he would at most [1011]*1011lie entitled to have these assessments reduced to the tentative valuations appearing upon the roll on grievance day. Having failed to sustain the burden of proving what these increases were, if any, relator is not in position to question the amount of these assessments on that ground. He has taken the position on this point regarding them that they should be voided altogether. He is not entitled to that relief. The order appealed from is affirmed.

Chief Judge Conway and Judges Desmond, Dye, Fuld, Froessel, Van Voorhis and Burke concur.

Orders affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

Relator seeks to vacate certain assessments in their entirety on the ground that they were increased after grievance day without notice to him, and without his having appeared or been examined. On this ground he would at most [1011]*1011lie entitled to have these assessments reduced to the tentative valuations appearing upon the roll on grievance day. Having failed to sustain the burden of proving what these increases were, if any, relator is not in position to question the amount of these assessments on that ground. He has taken the position on this point regarding them that they should be voided altogether. He is not entitled to that relief. The order appealed from is affirmed.

Chief Judge Conway and Judges Desmond, Dye, Fuld, Froessel, Van Voorhis and Burke concur.

Orders affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

147 N.E.2d 733, 3 N.Y.2d 1008, 170 N.Y.S.2d 342, 1957 N.Y. LEXIS 698, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/taylor-v-vion-ny-1957.