Taylor v. Vandervoort
9 Wend. 449
Opinion
Motion to stay proceedings until "the costs of a former suit prosecuted by the plaintiff by another person than the one now appearing as guardian in the superior court of the city of New-York. It was objected that the court would not compel the payment of costs in a suit in another court, and that the present guardian at all events should riot be made responsible for them, but the Court decided that the motion must be granted.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Taylor v. Vandervoort, 9 Wend. 449 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1832).
9 Wend. 449 (Taylor v. Vandervoort) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Solinskie v. Philadelphia & Reading Coal & Iron Co.
170 A.D. 919 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1915)
Buckles v. Chicago, M. & St. P. Ry. Co.
47 F. 424 (U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Western Missouri, 1891)
Ex parte Shear
92 Ala. 596 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1890)
People ex rel. Barry v. Mercein
3 Hill & Den. 399 (New York Supreme Court, 1842)