Taylor v. Universal Underwriters Ins. Co.

Ohio Supreme Court

Taylor v. Universal Underwriters Ins. Co.

792 N.E.2d 199, 99 Ohio St. 3d 1512

CourtOhio Supreme Court

DecidedJuly 30, 2003

Docket2003-0844

StatusPublished

This text of 792 N.E.2d 199 (Taylor v. Universal Underwriters Ins. Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Taylor v. Universal Underwriters Ins. Co., 792 N.E.2d 199, 99 Ohio St. 3d 1512 (Ohio 2003).

Pincite

Opinion

Franklin App. No. 01AP-922, 2003-0hio-1446. Discretionary appeal allowed on Propositions of Law Nos. I and II.

Moyer, C.J., and O’Connor, J., concur and would hold for the decision in 2002-0932, Westfield Ins. Co. v. Galatis, Summit App. No. 20784, 2002-0hio-1502. Lundberg Stratton and O’Donnell, JJ., concur and would hold for the decision in 2002-0579, Burkhart v. CNA Ins. Co., Stark App. No. 2001CA00265, 2002-0hio-903. Resnick, F.E. Sweeney and Pfeifer, JJ., dissent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Franklin App. No. 01AP-922, 2003-0hio-1446. Discretionary appeal allowed on Propositions of Law Nos. I and II.

Moyer, C.J., and O’Connor, J., concur and would hold for the decision in 2002-0932, Westfield Ins. Co. v. Galatis, Summit App. No. 20784, 2002-0hio-1502. Lundberg Stratton and O’Donnell, JJ., concur and would hold for the decision in 2002-0579, Burkhart v. CNA Ins. Co., Stark App. No. 2001CA00265, 2002-0hio-903. Resnick, F.E. Sweeney and Pfeifer, JJ., dissent.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

792 N.E.2d 199, 99 Ohio St. 3d 1512, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/taylor-v-universal-underwriters-ins-co-ohio-2003.