Taylor v. United States
44 Cust. Ct. 435
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Taylor v. United States. Read the opinion of the Court — 43 Cust. Ct. 205 →
United States Customs Court·Decided April 22, 1960·No. No. 64110; protest 140734-K/12986 (New Orleans)·Published
Opinion
Opinion by
In accordance with stipulation of counsel that che merchandise and issues are similar in all material respects to those involved in United States v. R. C. Williams & Co., Inc. (40 C.C.P.A. 130, C.A.D. 508), and Austin, Nichols & Co., Inc. v. United States (22 Cust. Ct. 33, C.D. 1155), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Taylor v. United States, 44 Cust. Ct. 435 (cusc 1960).
44 Cust. Ct. 435 (Taylor v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
United States v. R. C. Williams & Co.
40 C.C.P.A. 130 (Customs and Patent Appeals, 1953)
Austin, Nichols & Co. v. United States
22 Cust. Ct. 33 (U.S. Customs Court, 1949)