Taylor v. United States

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Taylor v. United States. Read the opinion of the Court — 310 Fed. Appx. 390
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit·Decided July 6, 2011·No. 2011-1230·Unpublished

Opinion

NOTE: This order is nonprecedential.

Wniteb ~tatei)

TAYLOR RUSSELL, ON BEHALF OF HIMSELF AND ALL OTHERS SIMILARLY SITUATED, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. UNITED STATES, Defendant-Appellee.

2011-1230

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Califomia in case no. 09-CV-3239, Judge William H. Alsup.

ON MOTION

ORDER Deepak Gupta moves to withdraw as counsel for the appellant, Taylor Russell. The court notes that counsel never filed an entry of appearance in this appeal. There- fore, the motion is unnecessary. Upon consideration thereof, IT Is ORDERED THAT:

L -________________ - RUSSELL v. US 2

The motion is moot. FOR THE COURT

JUt. 62011 lsI Jan Horbaly Date Jan Horbaly Clerk cc: S. Chandler Visher, Esq. Deepak Gupta, Esq. Alicia M. Hunt, Esq. FILED s21 II.S. COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT

JUL 062011

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Taylor v. United States, (Fed. Cir. 2011).

Taylor v. United States (Taylor v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.