Taylor v. United States
Opinion
NOTE: This order is nonprecedential.
Wniteb ~tatei)
TAYLOR RUSSELL, ON BEHALF OF HIMSELF AND ALL OTHERS SIMILARLY SITUATED, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. UNITED STATES, Defendant-Appellee.
2011-1230
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Califomia in case no. 09-CV-3239, Judge William H. Alsup.
ON MOTION
ORDER Deepak Gupta moves to withdraw as counsel for the appellant, Taylor Russell. The court notes that counsel never filed an entry of appearance in this appeal. There- fore, the motion is unnecessary. Upon consideration thereof, IT Is ORDERED THAT:
L -________________ - RUSSELL v. US 2
The motion is moot. FOR THE COURT
JUt. 62011 lsI Jan Horbaly Date Jan Horbaly Clerk cc: S. Chandler Visher, Esq. Deepak Gupta, Esq. Alicia M. Hunt, Esq. FILED s21 II.S. COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT
JUL 062011
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Taylor v. United States (Taylor v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.