Taylor v. United States

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedMarch 24, 2009
Docket09-1117
StatusUnpublished

This text of Taylor v. United States (Taylor v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Taylor v. United States, (4th Cir. 2009).

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 09-1117

ERIC EMANUEL TAYLOR,

Plaintiff – Appellant,

v.

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Defendant – Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Raymond A. Jackson, District Judge. (2:08-cv-00589-RAJ-JEB)

Submitted: March 17, 2009 Decided: March 24, 2009

Before TRAXLER, KING, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Eric Emanuel Taylor, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Eric Emanuel Taylor appeals the district court’s order

dismissing his civil complaint for failure to state a claim upon

which relief may be granted. We have reviewed the record and

find no abuse of discretion and no reversible error.

Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district

court. United States v. Taylor, No. 2:08-cv-00589-RAJ-JEB (E.D.

Va., Jan 16, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the

materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Taylor v. United States, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/taylor-v-united-states-ca4-2009.