Taylor v. United States
This text of Taylor v. United States (Taylor v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 09-1117
ERIC EMANUEL TAYLOR,
Plaintiff – Appellant,
v.
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Defendant – Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Raymond A. Jackson, District Judge. (2:08-cv-00589-RAJ-JEB)
Submitted: March 17, 2009 Decided: March 24, 2009
Before TRAXLER, KING, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Eric Emanuel Taylor, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:
Eric Emanuel Taylor appeals the district court’s order
dismissing his civil complaint for failure to state a claim upon
which relief may be granted. We have reviewed the record and
find no abuse of discretion and no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district
court. United States v. Taylor, No. 2:08-cv-00589-RAJ-JEB (E.D.
Va., Jan 16, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the
facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Taylor v. United States, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/taylor-v-united-states-ca4-2009.