Taylor v. United States Bankruptcy Court for South Carolina

119 F. App'x 570
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedFebruary 1, 2005
DocketNo. 04-2142
StatusPublished

This text of 119 F. App'x 570 (Taylor v. United States Bankruptcy Court for South Carolina) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Taylor v. United States Bankruptcy Court for South Carolina, 119 F. App'x 570 (4th Cir. 2005).

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM:

Ruben Dewayne Taylor appeals the district court’s order adopting the magistrate judge’s recommendation to dismiss without prejudice his complaint filed pursuant to Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388, 91 S.Ct. 1999, 29 L.Ed.2d 619 (1971). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Taylor v. USBC-SC, No. CA-03-4117-3-22BC (D.S.C. filed Aug. 30, 2004 & entered Aug. 31, 2004). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
119 F. App'x 570, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/taylor-v-united-states-bankruptcy-court-for-south-carolina-ca4-2005.