Taylor v. Umatilla County
6 Or. 394
Opinion
That the board of county commissioners is authorized to employ attorneys to represent the county in proceedings to which the county is a party or where the interests of the county are involved, and that Evarts having been employed by the board of county commissioners of Umatilla county in the action, the notice of appeal signed by him as the attorney of the county is not defective on that account.
Motion overruled.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Taylor v. Umatilla County, 6 Or. 394 (Or. 1877).
6 Or. 394 (Taylor v. Umatilla County) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Gosso v. Riddell
261 P. 77 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1927)
West v. Coos County
237 P. 961 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1925)
Wingate v. Clatsop County
142 P. 561 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1914)
Baskin v. Marion County
141 P. 1014 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1914)
State v. Hall
63 P. 13 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1900)