Taylor v. Tuson
This text of 51 N.E. 462 (Taylor v. Tuson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The defendant was a tenant at will of the plaintiff. The presiding justice rightly ruled that if the tenant did not give “a proper and legal notice sufficient to terminate said tenancy,” as the plaintiff did not accept the surrender of the premises, the tenancy at will was not determined by the tenant vacating the premises. Walker v. Furbush, 11 Cush. 366. Batchelder v. Batchelder, 2 Allen, 105. Whicher v. Cottrell, 165 Mass. 351. Pub. Sts. c. 121, § 12.
Exceptions overruled.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
51 N.E. 462, 172 Mass. 145, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/taylor-v-tuson-mass-1898.