Taylor v. Tuson
51 N.E. 462, 172 Mass. 145
Opinion
The defendant was a tenant at will of the plaintiff. The presiding justice rightly ruled that if the tenant did not give “a proper and legal notice sufficient to terminate said tenancy,” as the plaintiff did not accept the surrender of the premises, the tenancy at will was not determined by the tenant vacating the premises. Walker v. Furbush, 11 Cush. 366. Batchelder v. Batchelder, 2 Allen, 105. Whicher v. Cottrell, 165 Mass. 351. Pub. Sts. c. 121, § 12.
Exceptions overruled.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Taylor v. Tuson, 51 N.E. 462, 172 Mass. 145 (Mass. 1898).
51 N.E. 462 (Taylor v. Tuson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Schneider v. Systems Architects, Inc.
1980 Mass. App. Div. 31 (Mass. Dist. Ct., App. Div., 1980)
Hunter v. Klauber
24 Mass. App. Dec. 183 (Mass. Dist. Ct., App. Div., 1962)
Marr v. Doran
29 N.E.2d 711 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1940)
Marr v. Doran
5 Mass. App. Div. 27 (Mass. Dist. Ct., App. Div., 1940)
Caruso v. Shelit
184 N.E. 460 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1933)
Leavitt v. Maykel
96 N.E. 51 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1911)