Taylor v. Triangle Porsche-Audi, Inc.
223 S.E.2d 396, 289 N.C. 619, 1976 N.C. LEXIS 1369
This text of 223 S.E.2d 396 (Taylor v. Triangle Porsche-Audi, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Taylor v. Triangle Porsche-Audi, Inc., 223 S.E.2d 396, 289 N.C. 619, 1976 N.C. LEXIS 1369 (N.C. 1976).
Opinion
Robert Earl TAYLOR
v.
TRIANGLE PORSCHE-AUDI, INC.
Supreme Court of North Carolina.
Winston, Coleman & Bernholz, for plaintiff.
Newsom, Graham, Strayhorn, Hedrick, Murray & Bryson, for defendant.
Petition by plaintiff for discretionary review under GS 7A-31, 27 N.C.App. 711, 220 S.E.2d 806. Denied.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Taylor v. Triangle Porsche-Audi, Inc.
220 S.E.2d 806 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 1975)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
223 S.E.2d 396, 289 N.C. 619, 1976 N.C. LEXIS 1369, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/taylor-v-triangle-porsche-audi-inc-nc-1976.