Taylor v. Tolwin

1 N.C. 194

This text of 1 N.C. 194 (Taylor v. Tolwin) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering U.S. Circuit Court for the District of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Taylor v. Tolwin, 1 N.C. 194 (circtnc 1793).

Opinion

Doderidge, J. and Whitlock, J.

concurred. The statute 21 Jac. c. 13. p. 372. does not help this, for it aids only where the venire facias is of one place, where it should be of both, or e converso. But here is no place from which the venire is to be.

Doderidge, J. The statutes of Jeoffails have always been construed literally.

Adjournatur, the other Judges being absent.

And afterwards the court being full, was of the same opinion.

Hitcham, Serj.

prayed and obtained a repleader: for there could be no new trial. But if there had been an issue made, and a miss-trial, they would have awarded a new venire, and not a repleader. Godb. 469. 382. Bayneham's case. 5 Coke 36.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
1 N.C. 194, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/taylor-v-tolwin-circtnc-1793.