Taylor v. Todd

Fourth Circuit

Taylor v. Todd

290 F. App'x 567

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided August 25, 2008·No. No. 08-1372·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Carolyn Yvonne Murphy Taylor appeals the district court’s order accepting in part and declining in part the magistrate judge’s recommendation, and dismissing her action filed under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) and the South Carolina Torts Claims Act. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Taylor v. Todd, No. 3:07-cv-00983-JFA-JRM, 2008 WL 612779 (D.S.C. Feb. 29, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in [568]*568the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Carolyn Yvonne Murphy Taylor appeals the district court’s order accepting in part and declining in part the magistrate judge’s recommendation, and dismissing her action filed under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) and the South Carolina Torts Claims Act. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Taylor v. Todd, No. 3:07-cv-00983-JFA-JRM, 2008 WL 612779 (D.S.C. Feb. 29, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in [568]*568the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Taylor v. Todd, 290 F. App'x 567 (4th Cir. 2008).

Pincite

290 F. App'x 567 (Taylor v. Todd) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related