Taylor v. Thompson
This text of 61 N.H. 156 (Taylor v. Thompson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Hampshire primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
It is contended that the plaintiff, by bringing an action of covenant broken against Thurston, based on the incumbrance of the Towle mortgage, and settling it by taking Thurston’s, worthless note, on which he has received nothing, is barred from maintaining this action. It is a sufficient answer to this claim, that the note in suit was not included in the settlement of that action, and there is no suggestion either that the note has ever been paid by the defendant, or by any one for him, or that the defendant ought not to pay it, or that the plaintiff is not a bona fide holder of it.
Exceptions overruled.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
61 N.H. 156, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/taylor-v-thompson-nh-1881.