Taylor v. Teves

243 A.D. 567

Opinion

Order granting plaintiffs’ motion to set aside a verdict for the defendant, based on a collision between the plaintiff boy, a pedestrian, and the car operated by defendant, reversed on the law and the facts, with costs, verdict reinstated and judgment [568] directed, to be entered thereon, with costs. The court set aside the verdict on an erroneous statement of the evidence. It did so in violation of the frequently stated rule in respect of a defendant’s verdict in a tort action as compared with a plaintiff’s verdict in a tort action. That rule has been reiterated frequently by this court. (Seltzer v. Coney Island & Gravesend Ry. Co., 237 App. Div. 854; Solkey v. Beyer. 238 id. 809; Scheuerman v. Knapp Coal Co., Inc., Id. 874; Voyes v. Kane, 240 id. 710.) Lazansky, P. J., Young, Hagarty, Carswell and Tompkins, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Taylor v. Teves, 243 A.D. 567 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1934).

243 A.D. 567 (Taylor v. Teves) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Seltzer v. Coney Island & Gravesend Railway Co.
237 A.D. 854 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1932)