Taylor v. Taylor
This text of 70 A. 323 (Taylor v. Taylor) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Complainant filed a bill against her husband under the statute for a decree requiring him to pay alimony. He filed a cross-bill praying for divorce on the ground of desertion. By the final decree both bills were dismissed. Prom so much of the decree as dismisses the complainant’s bill she appeals. Defendant has not appealed.
We concur in the views expressed by Vice-Chancellor Learning so far as they relate to the dismissal of complainant’s bill, and the decree in that respect will therefore be affirmed.
For affirmance — The Chancellor, Chief-Justice, Garrison, Swayze, Trenchard, Parker, Bergen, Bogert, Vroom, Green, Gray, Dill — 12.
For reversal — None.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
70 A. 323, 73 N.J. Eq. 745, 3 Buchanan 745, 1908 N.J. LEXIS 254, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/taylor-v-taylor-nj-1908.