Taylor v. . Taylor

188 S.E. 95, 210 N.C. 837
CourtSupreme Court of North Carolina
DecidedNovember 4, 1936
StatusPublished

This text of 188 S.E. 95 (Taylor v. . Taylor) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Taylor v. . Taylor, 188 S.E. 95, 210 N.C. 837 (N.C. 1936).

Opinion

Civil action for alienation of affections.

Plaintiff and C. P. Taylor were married 26 November, 1933, while they were students in high school. The marriage was not publicly known until February, 1934. In July, 1934, they separated. Plaintiff brings this action against her father-in-law and her mother-in-law jointly for alienation of her husband's affections.

From a judgment of nonsuit entered at the close of plaintiff's evidence, plaintiff appeals, assigning errors. It would serve no useful purpose to detail the evidence in this case. Suffice it to say, it fails to establish liability under the principles announced in Hankins v. Hankins, 202 N.C. 358, 162 S.E. 766; Townsendv. Holderby, 197 N.C. 550, 149 S.E. 855; Brown v. Brown, 124 N.C. 19,32 S.E. 320.

There was no error in dismissing the action as in case of nonsuit.

Affirmed. *Page 838

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Brown v. . Brown
32 S.E. 320 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1899)
Hankins v. . Hankins
162 S.E. 766 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1932)
Townsend v. . Holderby
149 S.E. 855 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1929)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
188 S.E. 95, 210 N.C. 837, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/taylor-v-taylor-nc-1936.