Taylor v. Taylor
224 N.E.2d 453, 352 Mass. 765
Opinion
This is an appeal from a decree of the Probate Court allowing three accounts. The only issue before us is the reasonableness of the amount of the fee charged by the attorney for services rendered. We have reviewed the judge’s report of material facts and cannot say that he was plainly wrong. Crowell v. Styler, 314 Mass. 122, 125-126. McMahon v. Krapf, 323 Mass. 118, 124.
Decree affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Taylor v. Taylor, 224 N.E.2d 453, 352 Mass. 765 (Mass. 1967).
224 N.E.2d 453 (Taylor v. Taylor) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Crowell v. Styler
49 N.E.2d 599 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1943)
McMahon v. Krapf
80 N.E.2d 314 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1948)