Taylor v. Taylor
This text of 198 S.E. 678 (Taylor v. Taylor) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In a proceeding under the land-registration law, seeking an involuntary transfer of a registered certificate of title (Code, § 60-514), the defendant filed exceptions to certain findings of the examiner, and demanded a jury trial. On motion of the plaintiff, the exceptions to the findings of the examiner and the demand for a jury trial were dismissed. To this order the defendant excepted. Held:
1. There being no exception to any final judgment rendered by the court in the case, the same was prematurely brought to this court; and consequently the writ of error must be dismissed. Code, § 6-701; Mertims v. Pritohard, 135 Ga. 643 (70 S. E. 328). Whether the exceptions to the judge’s order dismissing the exceptions to the report of the examiner are sufficient to be considered by this court is not now determined.
2. Permission is given to the plaintiff in error to file the exceptions in the court below as exceptions pendente lite, to await the final determination of the case. Johnson v. Holmes, 150 Ga. 195 (103 S. E. 157); Armor v. Stubbs, 150 Ga. 520 (104 S. E. 500); Jenkins v. Lane, 150 Ga. 533 (104 S. E. 195) ; Bass Foundry & Machine Co. v. Miller, 153 Ga. 764 (113 S. E. 1); Ansley Park Golf Club v. Anderson, 179 Ga. 579 (176 S. E. 377). Writ of error dismissed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
198 S.E. 678, 186 Ga. 667, 1938 Ga. LEXIS 645, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/taylor-v-taylor-ga-1938.