Taylor v. Taylor

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Taylor v. Taylor

351 So. 2d 386

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Taylor v. Taylor. Read the opinion of the Court — 376 So. 2d 27 →

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided November 4, 1977·No. No. EE-89·Published

Opinion

SMITH, Acting Chief Judge.

The substantial fee money award by the trial court is not impeached by the record brought to us and is attributable to substantial services necessarily rendered in overcoming appellant’s apparent duplicity. Chaachou v. Chaachou, 135 So.2d 206 (Fla.1961).

AFFIRMED. Appellee’s motion for an allowance of fee money for the services of her attorney on appeal is PROVISIONALLY GRANTED. Dresser v. Dresser, 350 So.2d 1152 (Fla. 1st DCA 1977).

ERVIN and MELVIN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

SMITH, Acting Chief Judge.

The substantial fee money award by the trial court is not impeached by the record brought to us and is attributable to substantial services necessarily rendered in overcoming appellant’s apparent duplicity. Chaachou v. Chaachou, 135 So.2d 206 (Fla.1961).

AFFIRMED. Appellee’s motion for an allowance of fee money for the services of her attorney on appeal is PROVISIONALLY GRANTED. Dresser v. Dresser, 350 So.2d 1152 (Fla. 1st DCA 1977).

ERVIN and MELVIN, JJ., concur.

Taylor v. Taylor, 351 So. 2d 386 (Fla. Ct. App. 1977).

Pincite

351 So. 2d 386 (Taylor v. Taylor) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related