Taylor v. Tanner
84 S.E. 68, 143 Ga. 18, 1915 Ga. LEXIS 260
Opinion
-1. An approved brief of evidence is an indispensable part of a motion for a new trial; and if not prepared and presented as provided in the order setting the hearing in vacation, the motion for a new trial is properly dismissed on motion.
2. The final judgment complained of being the dismissal of the motion for a new trial, exceptions taken pending the trial of the main case, which are appropriate to be taken in a motion for new trial, are not reviewable.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Taylor v. Tanner, 84 S.E. 68, 143 Ga. 18, 1915 Ga. LEXIS 260 (Ga. 1915).
84 S.E. 68 (Taylor v. Tanner) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Hazen v. Isaac Fass Inc.
25 S.E.2d 118 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1943)
Automobile Insurance v. Watson
146 S.E. 922 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1929)
Tompkins v. Hardison
120 S.E. 556 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1923)
Grantham v. State
105 S.E. 713 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1921)