Taylor v. Tanner

84 S.E. 68, 143 Ga. 18, 1915 Ga. LEXIS 260
CourtSupreme Court of Georgia
DecidedJanuary 12, 1915
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases

This text of 84 S.E. 68 (Taylor v. Tanner) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Taylor v. Tanner, 84 S.E. 68, 143 Ga. 18, 1915 Ga. LEXIS 260 (Ga. 1915).

Opinion

Hill, J.

-1. An approved brief of evidence is an indispensable part of a motion for a new trial; and if not prepared and presented as provided in the order setting the hearing in vacation, the motion for a new trial is properly dismissed on motion.

2. The final judgment complained of being the dismissal of the motion for a new trial, exceptions taken pending the trial of the main case, which are appropriate to be taken in a motion for new trial, are not reviewable.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur, except Fish, O. J., absent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Hazen v. Isaac Fass Inc.
25 S.E.2d 118 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1943)
Automobile Insurance v. Watson
146 S.E. 922 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1929)
Tompkins v. Hardison
120 S.E. 556 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1923)
Grantham v. State
105 S.E. 713 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1921)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
84 S.E. 68, 143 Ga. 18, 1915 Ga. LEXIS 260, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/taylor-v-tanner-ga-1915.