Taylor v. State

280 S.W. 1118, 103 Tex. Crim. 333, 1926 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 209

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Taylor v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 98 Tex. Crim. 185 →

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas·Decided February 24, 1926·No. No. 9403.·Published

Opinion

*334 BERRY, Judge.

The offense is unlawful possession of a still and the punishment is two years in the penitentiary.

There are no bills of exceptions contained in the record and a careful examination of the facts convinces us that they were amply sufficient to support the verdict. It is accordingly ordered that the judgment be in all things affirmed.

Affirmed.

The foregoing opinion of the Commission of Appeals has been examined by the Judges of the Court of Criminal Appeals and approved by the Court.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

*334 BERRY, Judge.

The offense is unlawful possession of a still and the punishment is two years in the penitentiary.

Affirmed.

The foregoing opinion of the Commission of Appeals has been examined by the Judges of the Court of Criminal Appeals and approved by the Court.

Taylor v. State, 280 S.W. 1118, 103 Tex. Crim. 333, 1926 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 209 (Tex. 1926).

Pincite

280 S.W. 1118 (Taylor v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.