Taylor v. State

217 S.W. 937, 86 Tex. Crim. 463, 1920 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 16
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas·Decided January 14, 1920·No. No. 5589.·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

LATTIMORE, Judge.

—This appellant was convicted of the offense of theft, in the County Court at Law No. 2, of Jefferson County, and appeals to this Court.

We are met upon the threshold of our consideration of this ease, with the fact that the complaint is fatally defective, in that it does not allege from whose possession the alleged stolen property was taken. This is necessary. Littleton v. State, 20 Texas Crim. App., 168; White v. State, 33 Texas Crim. Rep., 94; Mixon v. State, 28 Texas Crim App., 347; Hill v. State, 55 Texas Crim. Rep., 407.

For the error mentioned, the judgment of the trial court is reversed, and the prosecution dismissed.

Dismissed,

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Taylor v. State, 217 S.W. 937, 86 Tex. Crim. 463, 1920 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 16 (Tex. 1920).

217 S.W. 937 (Taylor v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Clements v. State
375 S.W.2d 304 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1964)
Webb v. State
336 S.W.2d 158 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1960)
Freeman v. State
250 S.W.2d 223 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1952)