Taylor v. State

189 S.W.2d 142, 189 S.W. 142, 80 Tex. Crim. 132, 1916 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 275
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas·Decided October 25, 1916·No. No. 4235.·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

DAVIDSON, Judge.

Appellant was convicted of cattle theft, his punishment being assessed at two years confinement in the penitentiary.

This appeal must be dismissed, because appellant gave an appeal bond to this court instead of a recognizance, the instrument being, entered into during term time. The court adjourned on the 27th day of July, 1916. The bond for the • appeal to this court was entered into and approved on July 11, 1916. It is a bond taken and approved by the sheriff, and not a recognizance as required by the statute. During term time a recognizance must he taken; in vacation an appeal bond.

The appeal is dismissed.

Dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Taylor v. State, 189 S.W.2d 142, 189 S.W. 142, 80 Tex. Crim. 132, 1916 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 275 (Tex. 1916).

189 S.W.2d 142 (Taylor v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

King v. State
203 S.W. 52 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1918)