Taylor v. State

Mississippi Supreme Court

Taylor v. State

66 So. 321, 108 Miss. 18

Mississippi Supreme Court·Decided October 15, 1914·Published·Cited by 8 cases

Opinion

Smith, C. J.,

delivered the opinion of the court.

The evidence in this cause is wholly insufficient to support the. verdict. At most, <the testimony of the physicians who testified on behalf of the state discloses that [25] the child was probably horn alive, and that in their opinion, if horn alive, it died from suffocation brought about in some unknown way. The examination of the body of the child by these physicians failed to disclose any evidence of violence to its person, and'their opinion that it died from suffocation seems to be based upon the fact that their examination also failed to .disclose any reason why the child should have died from a natural cause.

Reversed and remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Smith, C. J.,

delivered the opinion of the court.

The evidence in this cause is wholly insufficient to support the. verdict. At most, <the testimony of the physicians who testified on behalf of the state discloses that [25] the child was probably horn alive, and that in their opinion, if horn alive, it died from suffocation brought about in some unknown way. The examination of the body of the child by these physicians failed to disclose any evidence of violence to its person, and'their opinion that it died from suffocation seems to be based upon the fact that their examination also failed to .disclose any reason why the child should have died from a natural cause.

Reversed and remanded.

Taylor v. State, 66 So. 321, 108 Miss. 18 (Mich. 1914).

Pincite

66 So. 321 (Taylor v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related