Taylor v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Taylor v. State

289 S.E.2d 283, 161 Ga. App. 19, 1982 Ga. App. LEXIS 2999

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedJanuary 21, 1982

Docket62740

StatusPublished

This text of 289 S.E.2d 283 (Taylor v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Taylor v. State, 289 S.E.2d 283, 161 Ga. App. 19, 1982 Ga. App. LEXIS 2999 (Ga. Ct. App. 1982).

Pincite

Opinion

Sognier, Judge.

Appellant’s probation was revoked after he was convicted of aggravated assault. His attorney filed a motion to withdraw as counsel pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (87 SC 1396, 18 LE2d 493). In accordance with Anders, counsel has filed a brief raising points of law which he considered could arguably support an appeal. We are in agreement with counsel that none of the points raised, though persuasively presented, have any merit. We have, therefore, granted the motion to withdraw. In addition, we have examined fully the record and transcript to determine independently if there are any meritorious errors of law. We find none. The evidence of appellant’s conviction for aggravated assault was not contested, and is sufficient to support the revocation of probation. Jones v. State, 153 Ga. App. 411, 412 (265 SE2d 334) (1980).

Judgment affirmed.

Shulman, P. J., and Birdsong, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Sognier, Judge.

Appellant’s probation was revoked after he was convicted of aggravated assault. His attorney filed a motion to withdraw as counsel pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (87 SC 1396, 18 LE2d 493). In accordance with Anders, counsel has filed a brief raising points of law which he considered could arguably support an appeal. We are in agreement with counsel that none of the points raised, though persuasively presented, have any merit. We have, therefore, granted the motion to withdraw. In addition, we have examined fully the record and transcript to determine independently if there are any meritorious errors of law. We find none. The evidence of appellant’s conviction for aggravated assault was not contested, and is sufficient to support the revocation of probation. Jones v. State, 153 Ga. App. 411, 412 (265 SE2d 334) (1980).

Judgment affirmed.

Shulman, P. J., and Birdsong, J., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

289 S.E.2d 283, 161 Ga. App. 19, 1982 Ga. App. LEXIS 2999, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/taylor-v-state-gactapp-1982.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack