Taylor v. State

93 S.E. 236, 20 Ga. App. 722, 1917 Ga. App. LEXIS 1049
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedAugust 3, 1917
Docket8872
StatusPublished

This text of 93 S.E. 236 (Taylor v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Taylor v. State, 93 S.E. 236, 20 Ga. App. 722, 1917 Ga. App. LEXIS 1049 (Ga. Ct. App. 1917).

Opinion

Luke, J.

There is no merit in the assignments of error on the admission of testimony, the charge of the court was full and fair and was not subject to the. assignments of error thereon, the evidence authorized the conviction of the accused, and the newly discovered evidence is not such as would be likely to produce a different verdict on another trial. The court did not err in overruling the motion for a new trial.

Judgment affirmed.

Wade, O. J., and George, J., concur. Accusation of sale of liquor; from city court of Carrollton— Judge Beall. May 4, 1917. E. T. Steed, James & Bedgood, for plaintiff in error. Willis Smith, solicitor, contra.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
93 S.E. 236, 20 Ga. App. 722, 1917 Ga. App. LEXIS 1049, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/taylor-v-state-gactapp-1917.