Taylor v. State
This text of 48 S.E. 158 (Taylor v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Where an affidavit, the basis of a criminal accusation in a city court, charged that the accused did, on a given date and in a named county, “ commit the offense of simple larceny, for that” he then and there “did unlawfully and wrongfully take and carry away” designated property, belonging to a named person and of a stated value, and the accusation followed this affidavit, but contained the additional averment that the taking and carrying away was with intent to steal, it was not erroneous to overrule an objection, made during the progress of the trial, “ to the defendant’s being tried further,” because the affidavit failed to allege an intent to steal. Dickson v. State, 62 Ga. 583; Williams v. State, 107 Ga. 693; Surrels v. State, 113 Ga. 715. Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
48 S.E. 158, 120 Ga. 484, 1904 Ga. LEXIS 603, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/taylor-v-state-ga-1904.