Taylor v. State
858 So. 2d 1133, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 16808, 2003 WL 22508397
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Taylor v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 796 So. 2d 570 →
Opinion
We dismiss this appeal for lack of jurisdiction. The motion for reduction of sentence pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(c), is addressed to the discretion of the trial court. Therefore, [1134]*1134this Court has no jurisdiction to review the correctness of the trial court’s disposition of the motion. Daniels v. State, 568 So.2d 68 (Fla. 1st DCA 1990).
DISMISSED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Taylor v. State, 858 So. 2d 1133, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 16808, 2003 WL 22508397 (Fla. Ct. App. 2003).
858 So. 2d 1133 (Taylor v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Board of County Commissioners v. Florida Department of Transportation
568 So. 2d 67 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1990)