Taylor v. State

832 So. 2d 831, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 16846, 2002 WL 31507052
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided November 13, 2002·No. No. 4D01-1710·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

POLEN, C.J.

We find all of Taylor’s challenges on appeal of his burglary conviction and sentence unpersuasive. However, we note his scoresheet improperly scored a theft charge of which he had been acquitted. This error was harmless as to Taylor’s sentence where the sentencing judge, who had also presided over the trial, was aware Taylor had in fact been acquitted of the theft charge, and its inclusion on the score-sheet had no affect on his guidelines sentence. Still, Taylor is entitled to have his scoresheet corrected. See Poole v. State, 777 So.2d 1186 (Fla. 5th DCA 2001). This matter is therefore remanded to the trial court so that it may remove the theft charge from Taylor’s scoresheet. This case is solely remanded for correction of the scoresheet issue. A full re-sentencing is not mandated and Taylor need not be present for this administerial matter.

REMANDED for correction.

FARMER and TAYLOR, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Taylor v. State, 832 So. 2d 831, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 16846, 2002 WL 31507052 (Fla. Ct. App. 2002).

832 So. 2d 831 (Taylor v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Lorenzo Lee Feaster v. State of Florida
District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2026
Beach Higher Power Corp. v. Rekant
832 So. 2d 831 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2002)