Taylor v. State
804 So. 2d 1282, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 579, 2002 WL 91010
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Taylor v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 740 So. 2d 89 →
Opinion
Michael Taylor appeals the summary denial of his motion to correct illegal sentence filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a). Because Taylor’s motion is facially insufficient, we affirm the trial court’s order without prejudice to Taylor’s right to raise the issue in a rule 3.800(a) motion which meets the pleading requirement of Bain v. State, 784 So.2d 1168 (Fla. 2d DCA 2001), or in a sworn rule 3.850 motion. See Bryant v. State, 787 So.2d 68 (Fla. 2d DCA 2001).
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Taylor v. State, 804 So. 2d 1282, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 579, 2002 WL 91010 (Fla. Ct. App. 2002).
804 So. 2d 1282 (Taylor v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Bain v. State
784 So. 2d 1168 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2001)
Bryant v. State
787 So. 2d 68 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2001)