Taylor v. State

214 So. 2d 374
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Taylor v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 1967 Fla. App. LEXIS 4902
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided October 1, 1968·No. No. 68-130·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Counsel for the appellant [the public defender] having filed a motion to withdraw in this case together with a memorandum brief, which motion was granted on May 1, 1968 with the appellant being granted thirty days within which to file such brief if he should so desire in addition to that filed by the public defender and, the time now having elapsed, the court has reviewed the record and the memorandum brief in the file, pursuant to the provisions of Anders v. State of California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 and, finding no merit to the appeal, the judgment, conviction, and sentence be and the same is hereby affirmed.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Taylor v. State, 214 So. 2d 374 (Fla. Ct. App. 1968).

214 So. 2d 374 (Taylor v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Anders v. California
386 U.S. 738 (Supreme Court, 1967)