Taylor v. State

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Taylor v. State

39 S.W.3d 766, 344 Ark. 187, 2001 Ark. LEXIS 168

Supreme Court of Arkansas·Decided March 15, 2001·No. CR 01-215·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Petitioner, James Andrew Taylor, by his attorney, David Mark Gunter, has filed a motion for rule on the clerk. His attorney admits that the record was tendered late due to a mistake on his part.

We find that such error, admittedly made by the attorney for a criminal defendant, is good cause to grant the motion. See Terry v. State, 272 Ark. 243, 613 S.W.2d 90 (1981); In Re: Belated Appeals in Criminal Cases, 265 Ark. 964 (1979) (per curiam).

The motion for rule on the clerk is, therefore, granted. A copy of this per curiam will be forwarded to the Committee on Professional Conduct.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Petitioner, James Andrew Taylor, by his attorney, David Mark Gunter, has filed a motion for rule on the clerk. His attorney admits that the record was tendered late due to a mistake on his part.

We find that such error, admittedly made by the attorney for a criminal defendant, is good cause to grant the motion. See Terry v. State, 272 Ark. 243, 613 S.W.2d 90 (1981); In Re: Belated Appeals in Criminal Cases, 265 Ark. 964 (1979) (per curiam).

The motion for rule on the clerk is, therefore, granted. A copy of this per curiam will be forwarded to the Committee on Professional Conduct.

Taylor v. State, 39 S.W.3d 766, 344 Ark. 187, 2001 Ark. LEXIS 168 (Ark. 2001).

Pincite

39 S.W.3d 766 (Taylor v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related