Home/Supreme Court of Arkansas/Taylor v. State

Taylor v. State

39 S.W.3d 766, 344 Ark. 187, 2001 Ark. LEXIS 168
CourtSupreme Court of Arkansas
DecidedMarch 15, 2001
DocketCR 01-215
StatusPublished

This text of 39 S.W.3d 766 (Taylor v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Arkansas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Taylor v. State, 39 S.W.3d 766, 344 Ark. 187, 2001 Ark. LEXIS 168 (Ark. 2001).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Petitioner, James Andrew Taylor, by his attorney, David Mark Gunter, has filed a motion for rule on the clerk. His attorney admits that the record was tendered late due to a mistake on his part.

We find that such error, admittedly made by the attorney for a criminal defendant, is good cause to grant the motion. See Terry v. State, 272 Ark. 243, 613 S.W.2d 90 (1981); In Re: Belated Appeals in Criminal Cases, 265 Ark. 964 (1979) (per curiam).

The motion for rule on the clerk is, therefore, granted. A copy of this per curiam will be forwarded to the Committee on Professional Conduct.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Terry v. State
613 S.W.2d 90 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 1981)
Terry v. State
613 S.W.2d 90 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 1981)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
39 S.W.3d 766, 344 Ark. 187, 2001 Ark. LEXIS 168, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/taylor-v-state-ark-2001.