Taylor v. State

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Taylor v. State

900 S.W.2d 546, 321 Ark. 291, 1995 Ark. LEXIS 401

CourtSupreme Court of Arkansas

DecidedJuly 3, 1995

DocketCR 95-597

StatusPublished

This text of 900 S.W.2d 546 (Taylor v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Arkansas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Taylor v. State, 900 S.W.2d 546, 321 Ark. 291, 1995 Ark. LEXIS 401 (Ark. 1995).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Anthony Lynn Taylor, by his attorney, Tim Buckley, has filed a motion for a rule on the clerk. His attorney admits by motion that the record was tendered late due to a mistake on his part.

We find that such an error, admittedly made by the attorney for a criminal defendant, is good cause to grant the motion. See In Re: Belated Appeals in Criminal Cases, 265 Ark. 964 (1979) (per curiam). The motion is, therefore, granted.

A copy of this opinion will be forwarded to the Committee on Professional Conduct.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

Anthony Lynn Taylor, by his attorney, Tim Buckley, has filed a motion for a rule on the clerk. His attorney admits by motion that the record was tendered late due to a mistake on his part.

We find that such an error, admittedly made by the attorney for a criminal defendant, is good cause to grant the motion. See In Re: Belated Appeals in Criminal Cases, 265 Ark. 964 (1979) (per curiam). The motion is, therefore, granted.

A copy of this opinion will be forwarded to the Committee on Professional Conduct.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

900 S.W.2d 546, 321 Ark. 291, 1995 Ark. LEXIS 401, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/taylor-v-state-ark-1995.