Taylor v. State

Supreme Court of Alabama

Taylor v. State

52 So. 736, 167 Ala. 91, 1910 Ala. LEXIS 458

CourtSupreme Court of Alabama

DecidedJune 16, 1910

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 52 So. 736 (Taylor v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Alabama primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Taylor v. State, 52 So. 736, 167 Ala. 91, 1910 Ala. LEXIS 458 (Ala. 1910).

Pincite

Opinion

DOWDELL, C. J.

The appeal in this case is prosecuted from a judgment of conviction in the criminal court of Jefferson county. There is no bill of exceptions in the record.

The sentence of the court for the costs fails to ascertain the amount of the costs, or to fix the time of hard labor for working out the same. In this respect, and in this only, the judgment is erroneous. Under the authority of Linnehan v. State, 120 Ala. 293, 25 South. 6, the judgment must be reversed hack to the judgment of conviction, and the cause remanded for proper sentence by the court.

Reversed and remanded.

Simpson, McClellan, and Mayfield, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI