Taylor v. State

42 So. 997, 148 Ala. 565, 1907 Ala. LEXIS 672
CourtSupreme Court of Alabama
DecidedJanuary 17, 1907
StatusPublished
Cited by6 cases

This text of 42 So. 997 (Taylor v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Alabama primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Taylor v. State, 42 So. 997, 148 Ala. 565, 1907 Ala. LEXIS 672 (Ala. 1907).

Opinion

DOWDELL, J.

There is but one question presented for our consideration. The indictment charges that the defendant committed the homicide by shooting the deceased with a pistol, and the evidence shows that the shooting was done with a shotgun-. The defendant objected to this evidence on the ground of a variance, and also requested a charge to the jury for his acquittal on the same ground. This question has been deicded adversely to the appellant in the case of Turner v. State, 97 Ala. 57, 12 South. 54. See, also, Jones v. State, 137 Ala. 12, 34 South. 681.

[566]*566There is no error in the record., and the judgment is affirmed.

Affirmed.

Tyson, C. J., and Andebson and McClellan, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Weaver v. State
407 So. 2d 568 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama, 1981)
Stevenson v. State
404 So. 2d 111 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama, 1981)
Dawson v. State
266 So. 2d 806 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama, 1972)
Williamson v. State
179 So. 398 (Alabama Court of Appeals, 1938)
Matthews v. State
74 So. 759 (Alabama Court of Appeals, 1917)
Alabama Great Southern Railway Co. v. McFarlin
56 So. 989 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1911)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
42 So. 997, 148 Ala. 565, 1907 Ala. LEXIS 672, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/taylor-v-state-ala-1907.