Taylor v. State
22 Ala. 15
Opinion
We think the court below mistook the law, in both the charges given; for our opinion is, that a field surrounded by a forest, and one mile from any highway or other public place, does not lose its private character by the casual presence of three persons. Yet such is the effect of the ruling in the court below.
Let the judgment be reversed, and the cause remanded.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Taylor v. State, 22 Ala. 15 (Ala. 1853).
22 Ala. 15 (Taylor v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
James v. City of Birmingham
926 F. Supp. 2d 1260 (N.D. Alabama, 2013)
In Re May
584 S.E.2d 271 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 2003)
Schultz v. State
437 So. 2d 670 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama, 1983)
Gamble v. State
39 S.E. 301 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1901)