Taylor v. Stapp
This text of 201 S.E.2d 419 (Taylor v. Stapp) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This appeal is before this court on the denial of purported interlocutory injunctions. The record shows that the appellant filed motions to restrain the appellee from threatening to bankrupt to defeat an anticipated judgment, to restrain the Atlanta Law Department and the Atlanta city attorney from defending the defendant, and to restrain the Atlanta police from destroying public records. The trial court denied the motions without a hearing. No certificate of immediate review was filed. A motion to dismiss the appeal for prematurity has been filed in this court. Held:
The motion to dismiss the appeal is granted. The motion to restrain the appellee from threatening to bankrupt to defeat an anticipated judgment is not a matter for interlocutory injunction. The other motions seeking restraining orders are against parties who are not parties to this claim. Therefore, this appeal is not from the denial of an interlocutory injunction as [269]*269may be directly appealed under the provisions of Code Ann. § 6-701 (a) (1, 3) (Ga. L. 1965, p. 18; 1968, pp. 1072, 1073).
Appeal dismissed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
201 S.E.2d 419, 231 Ga. 268, 1973 Ga. LEXIS 666, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/taylor-v-stapp-ga-1973.