Taylor v. Stansberry
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 06-6325
OSCAR LEE TAYLOR,
Petitioner - Appellant,
versus
PATRICIA R. STANSBERRY; HARLEY LAPPIN; P. GUANJA, Regional Director; A. GONZALES,
Respondents - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Terrence W. Boyle, District Judge. (5:06-hc-00023-BO)
Submitted: August 31, 2006 Decided: September 13, 2006
Before TRAXLER and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Oscar Lee Taylor, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:
Oscar Lee Taylor, a federal prisoner, appeals the
district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241
(2000) petition. We have reviewed the record and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by
the district court. Taylor v. Stansberry, No. 5:06-hc-00023-BO
(E.D.N.C. Feb. 3, 2006). We dispense with oral argument because
the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
- 2 -
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Taylor v. Stansberry (Taylor v. Stansberry) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.