Taylor v. . Spivey

33 N.C. 427
Supreme Court of North Carolina·Decided December 5, 1850·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Peabsoit, J.

This was a warrant on a former judgment of a single justice. The defendants relied on the statute of limitations. The plaintiffs in the replication alleged a' new promise within the seven years. His Honor correctly decided, that the statute could not thus be met. The replication of a new promise is confined to actions ‘on promises.” This is settled in this State and England.

The other instructions were uncalled for; at all events the plaintiffhas no right to complain of them.

Per Curiam, Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Taylor v. . Spivey, 33 N.C. 427 (N.C. 1850).

33 N.C. 427 (Taylor v. . Spivey) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Olson v. Dahl
109 N.W. 1001 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1906)