Taylor v. Spaulding

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Taylor v. Spaulding

32 N.W. 863, 36 Minn. 550, 1887 Minn. LEXIS 277

CourtSupreme Court of Minnesota

DecidedMay 12, 1887

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 32 N.W. 863 (Taylor v. Spaulding) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Minnesota primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Taylor v. Spaulding, 32 N.W. 863, 36 Minn. 550, 1887 Minn. LEXIS 277 (Mich. 1887).

Pincite

Opinion

Gileillan, G. J.

The rule laid down in Hicks v. Stone, 13 Minn. 398, (434,) that, to justify us in reversing an order of the trial court granting a new trial on the ground that the verdict is not sustained by tbe evidence, we must feel satisfied that the preponderance of the evidence is manifestly and palpably in favor of the verdict, and followed in many cases since, disposes of this case. Upon reading over the evidence we cannot say that there is any preponderance in favor of the verdict.

Order affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Gileillan, G. J.

The rule laid down in Hicks v. Stone, 13 Minn. 398, (434,) that, to justify us in reversing an order of the trial court granting a new trial on the ground that the verdict is not sustained by tbe evidence, we must feel satisfied that the preponderance of the evidence is manifestly and palpably in favor of the verdict, and followed in many cases since, disposes of this case. Upon reading over the evidence we cannot say that there is any preponderance in favor of the verdict.

Order affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

32 N.W. 863, 36 Minn. 550, 1887 Minn. LEXIS 277, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/taylor-v-spaulding-minn-1887.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack