Taylor v. Social Security Administration
This text of Taylor v. Social Security Administration (Taylor v. Social Security Administration) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, E.D. Arkansas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS CENTRAL DIVISION AMANDA TAYLOR, ** * Plaintiff, ** Vv. ** No. 4:25-cv-00389-JJV * FRANK BISIGNANO, ** Commissioner, * Social Security Administration, ** * Defendant. ** ORDER Defendant filed an unopposed Motion to Remand this case (Doc. No. 9) pursuant to sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) (1995): The court shall have the power to enter, upon the pleadings and transcript of the record, a judgment affirming, modifying, or reversing the decision of the Commissioner of Social Security, with or without remanding the cause for a rehearing. The Commissioner seeks remand to conduct further proceedings and states opposing counsel has no objection to the requested remand. Under the circumstances, a “sentence four” remand is appropriate. Buckner v. Apfel, 213 F.3d 1006, 1010-11 (8th Cir. 2000). Accordingly, the Commissioner’s decision is reversed and remanded for action consistent with this opinion. This is a “sentence four” remand within the meaning of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) and Melkonyan vy. Sullivan, 501 U.S. 89 (1991). SO ORDERED this 14th day of August 2025. \ i \ JO Ey OWMP bk / NO —-~ WNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Taylor v. Social Security Administration, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/taylor-v-social-security-administration-ared-2025.