Taylor v. . Simmons

20 S.E. 961, 116 N.C. 70
CourtSupreme Court of North Carolina
DecidedFebruary 5, 1895
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases

This text of 20 S.E. 961 (Taylor v. . Simmons) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Taylor v. . Simmons, 20 S.E. 961, 116 N.C. 70 (N.C. 1895).

Opinion

Clark, J.:

At tbe last Term of this Court, being the first Term of this Court after the trial below, the appellant docketed the record proper and applied for a certiorari as the case had not been settled by the Judge. Pittman v. Kimberly, 92 N. C., 562. By consent the motion was continued to this term. It appears that the ease and counter-case were served in time and that the appellant immediately applied to the Judge to settle the case. The appellant' would be entitled to his certiorari, but as the trial Judge (His Honor Judge Graves) has since died, the Court must order a new trial. State v. Parks, 107 N. C., 821.

New Trial.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Larkey Lumber & Wrecking Co. v. Byrnes
181 S.W.2d 361 (Tennessee Supreme Court, 1944)
Dennis v. State
137 Tenn. 543 (Tennessee Supreme Court, 1917)
Richardson v. State
89 P. 1027 (Wyoming Supreme Court, 1907)
Nelson v. Marshall
58 A. 793 (Supreme Court of Vermont, 1904)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
20 S.E. 961, 116 N.C. 70, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/taylor-v-simmons-nc-1895.