Taylor v. Shell

145 S.W. 539, 102 Ark. 649, 1912 Ark. LEXIS 107
CourtSupreme Court of Arkansas
DecidedMarch 18, 1912
StatusPublished

This text of 145 S.W. 539 (Taylor v. Shell) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Arkansas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Taylor v. Shell, 145 S.W. 539, 102 Ark. 649, 1912 Ark. LEXIS 107 (Ark. 1912).

Opinion

Wood, J.,

(after stating the facts). In the absence of a showing to the contrary, it will be presumed that the decree of the court was' correct.

There is nothing in the record as abstracted by appellant to show that the grantors in the deed of trust waived their right to redeem under section 5420, Kirby’s Digest. Assuming that such right had not been waived, the decree of the court is correct. For, in the absence of such showing, the decree should be treated as granting to appellee redemption from the sale. The decree giving him such right was entered before the sale was confirmed.

It matters not in what form the application of appellee for redemption was couched, unless the grantors in the deed of trust had waived their right of redemption, appellee 'would be entitled to it, and the decree of the court granting such rights will not be reversed because of informalities in the petition of the applicant.

The decree of the court, for aught that appears to the contrary in the record, was tantamount to allowing appellee the right to redeem, and, so treated, it is correct, and it is unnecessary for us to consider the question of whether or not the sale should have been confirmed to appellant as urged in her brief.

The judgment is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
145 S.W. 539, 102 Ark. 649, 1912 Ark. LEXIS 107, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/taylor-v-shell-ark-1912.