Taylor v. Segraves
This text of 582 So. 2d 464 (Taylor v. Segraves) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Alabama primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Johnny Taylor appeals from the summary judgment in favor of Phil Segraves in his suit against Segraves, Bill Rayburn, and Golden Rule Insurance Company based on an alleged fraud and negligent failure to procure insurance.1 This Court affirmed the rescission of the insurance contract (which Golden Rule had sought in its counterclaim against Taylor) in Taylor v. Golden Rule Insurance Co., 544 So.2d 932 (Ala.1989). We find that the judgment for Seg-raves is due to be affirmed on the authority of that case.
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
582 So. 2d 464, 1991 Ala. LEXIS 343, 1991 WL 90762, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/taylor-v-segraves-ala-1991.