Taylor v. Red Lake Falls Lumber Co.

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Taylor v. Red Lake Falls Lumber Co.

84 N.W. 301, 81 Minn. 492, 1900 Minn. LEXIS 683

Supreme Court of Minnesota·Decided December 5, 1900·No. Nos. 12,461—(57)·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The return herein is wholly insufficient, because the proceedings in district court are not certified to in any manner, except that it appears that an appeal has therein been taken from an order dismissing an appeal from a judgment entered in justice’s court, and, under a peculiar statute, affirming said judgment. Such an order is not appealable. Graham v. Conrad, 66 Minn. 470, 69 N. W. 215.

Appeal dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The return herein is wholly insufficient, because the proceedings in district court are not certified to in any manner, except that it appears that an appeal has therein been taken from an order dismissing an appeal from a judgment entered in justice’s court, and, under a peculiar statute, affirming said judgment. Such an order is not appealable. Graham v. Conrad, 66 Minn. 470, 69 N. W. 215.

Appeal dismissed.

Taylor v. Red Lake Falls Lumber Co., 84 N.W. 301, 81 Minn. 492, 1900 Minn. LEXIS 683 (Mich. 1900).

Pincite

84 N.W. 301 (Taylor v. Red Lake Falls Lumber Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related