Taylor v. Red Lake Falls Lumber Co.

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Taylor v. Red Lake Falls Lumber Co.

84 N.W. 301, 81 Minn. 492, 1900 Minn. LEXIS 683

CourtSupreme Court of Minnesota

DecidedDecember 5, 1900

DocketNos. 12,461—(57)

StatusPublished

This text of 84 N.W. 301 (Taylor v. Red Lake Falls Lumber Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Minnesota primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Taylor v. Red Lake Falls Lumber Co., 84 N.W. 301, 81 Minn. 492, 1900 Minn. LEXIS 683 (Mich. 1900).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The return herein is wholly insufficient, because the proceedings in district court are not certified to in any manner, except that it appears that an appeal has therein been taken from an order dismissing an appeal from a judgment entered in justice’s court, and, under a peculiar statute, affirming said judgment. Such an order is not appealable. Graham v. Conrad, 66 Minn. 470, 69 N. W. 215.

Appeal dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The return herein is wholly insufficient, because the proceedings in district court are not certified to in any manner, except that it appears that an appeal has therein been taken from an order dismissing an appeal from a judgment entered in justice’s court, and, under a peculiar statute, affirming said judgment. Such an order is not appealable. Graham v. Conrad, 66 Minn. 470, 69 N. W. 215.

Appeal dismissed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

84 N.W. 301, 81 Minn. 492, 1900 Minn. LEXIS 683, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/taylor-v-red-lake-falls-lumber-co-minn-1900.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack