Taylor v. Purvis
This text of 19 S.C.L. 373 (Taylor v. Purvis) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of South Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Whether a credit indorsed on a note, was on ac" count of a payment actually made, or voluntary, and intended to bring the case within the summary jurisdiction, is a question for the determination of the Circut Court. The sum. pro. jurisdiction of the court is limited to £20 sterling, equal to $85 71 3-7; and where the plaintiff’s demand, at the time of action [374]*374brought, was within the jurisdiction, but at the time trial, by the accumulation of interest, exceeded it, the plaintiff at his election, may take judgement to the extent of the jurisdiction, or declare, and transfer the case to the general jurisdiction. (Vide Gracey & Co. Wright, 2 M’C. 278.)
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
19 S.C.L. 373, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/taylor-v-purvis-scctapp-1833.