Taylor v. Pipes

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Taylor v. Pipes

24 La. Ann. 551

CourtSupreme Court of Louisiana

DecidedJuly 15, 1872

DocketNo. 284

StatusPublished

Cited by6 cases

This text of 24 La. Ann. 551 (Taylor v. Pipes) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Taylor v. Pipes, 24 La. Ann. 551 (La. 1872).

Pincite

Opinions

Wyly, J.

A motion is made to dismiss this appeal:

First — Because the amount of the bond is not sufficient for a suspensive appeal.

Second — Because only one of the defendants in solido has appealed.

Third — Bt cause tile clerk’s certificate to the transcript is not sufficient.

The bond, being for the amount fixed by the judge, is good for a ¡devolutive appeal, if it is not sufficient for a suspensive appeal.

As the appeal was taken by motion in open court and the bond given in favor of the clerk, all the necessary parties are before the court.

The certificate of the clerk we consider sufficient; besides, if insufficient, it is no ground'to dismiss the appeal, the fault being attributable ¡to the clerk.

The motion to dismiss is therefore denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI