Taylor v. Philadelphia & Reading Railroad

U.S. Circuit Court

Taylor v. Philadelphia & Reading Railroad

7 F. 377, 1880 U.S. App. LEXIS 2726

CourtUnited States Circuit Court

DecidedAugust 6, 1880

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 7 F. 377 (Taylor v. Philadelphia & Reading Railroad) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Circuit Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Taylor v. Philadelphia & Reading Railroad, 7 F. 377, 1880 U.S. App. LEXIS 2726 (uscirct 1880).

Pincite

Opinion

McKennan, C. J.

The order referred to in the foregoing report was made with special reference to the principles announced and discussed in Fosdick v. Schall, 99 U. S. 235. It was deemed to be a full warrant for the order, as ivas also the manifest justness of the-method of appropriation prescribed. The masters have shown that it has also the support of other adjudications, and specially of the judgment of the eminent circuit justice of this circuit, which of itself commands controlling consideration in this court.

The report of the masters is therefore approved, and it is directed that an order be entered in the form therein recommended by them.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

McKennan, C. J.

The order referred to in the foregoing report was made with special reference to the principles announced and discussed in Fosdick v. Schall, 99 U. S. 235. It was deemed to be a full warrant for the order, as ivas also the manifest justness of the-method of appropriation prescribed. The masters have shown that it has also the support of other adjudications, and specially of the judgment of the eminent circuit justice of this circuit, which of itself commands controlling consideration in this court.

The report of the masters is therefore approved, and it is directed that an order be entered in the form therein recommended by them.

In Re Boston and Maine Corporation, Debtor, Appeal of Chesapeake and Ohio Railway Company, in Re Boston and Maine Corporation, Debtor, Appeal of Maine Central Railroad Company, in Re Boston and Maine Corporation, Debtor, Appeal of Penn Central Corporation, in Re Boston and Maine Corporation, Debtor, Appeal of Canadian Pacific, in Re Boston and Maine Corporation, Debtor, Appeal of Eastern Associated Coal Corporation

634 F.2d 1359 (First Circuit, 1980)

In re Boston & Maine Corp.

634 F.2d 1359 (First Circuit, 1980)

Atkins v. Petersburg R.

2 F. Cas. 90 (U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Virginia, 1879)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

7 F. 377, 1880 U.S. App. LEXIS 2726, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/taylor-v-philadelphia-reading-railroad-uscirct-1880.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack