Taylor v. Ozmint

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Taylor v. Ozmint. Read the opinion of the Court — 424 F. App'x 231
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided April 20, 2011·No. 10-7348·Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 10-7348

ALEX D. TAYLOR,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

JON OZMINT, Director SCDC,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Aiken. Terry L. Wooten, District Judge. (1:09-cv-00915-TLW)

Submitted: March 17, 2011 Decided: April 20, 2011

Before MOTZ, SHEDD, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Alex D. Taylor, Appellant Pro Se. Andrew Lindemann, DAVIDSON & LINDEMANN, PA, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Alex D. Taylor appeals the district court’s order

accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying

relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We have

reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly,

we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court.

Taylor v. Ozmint, No. 1:09-cv-00915-TLW (D.S.C. Sept. 16, 2010).

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Taylor v. Ozmint, (4th Cir. 2011).

Taylor v. Ozmint (Taylor v. Ozmint) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related