Taylor v. O'Neil

Supreme Court of Rhode Island

Taylor v. O'Neil

2 A. 299, 15 R.I. 198

Supreme Court of Rhode Island·Decided December 10, 1885·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The court thinks that the declaration should set forth the title of the plaintiff in terms so explicit that a judgment in his favor will determine the ehar *199 acter of his estate, and not simply his right of possession. Stephens on Pleading, *304-308. Demurrer sustained.

Thomas W. Robinson, for plaintiff. William H. Clapp, for defendants.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

The court thinks that the declaration should set forth the title of the plaintiff in terms so explicit that a judgment in his favor will determine the ehar *199 acter of his estate, and not simply his right of possession. Stephens on Pleading, *304-308. Demurrer sustained.

Thomas W. Robinson, for plaintiff. William H. Clapp, for defendants.

Taylor v. O'Neil, 2 A. 299, 15 R.I. 198 (R.I. 1885).

Pincite

2 A. 299 (Taylor v. O'Neil) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.